Tom Roper's Weblog

Media librarians

Following neatly some of the things Gertrud Erbach had to say at UCL last week, today's Guardian carries a piece by Richard Nelsson on the future for media librarians to mark the twentieth anniversary of the Association of UK Media Librarians (AUKML). Personal trivia: I was a AUKML member in the early 90s, during a brief period as a picture librarian and researcher.
There are some annoying registration hoops to jump through before the Guardian will reveal the full text.

Technorati Tags: medialibrarians, AUKML

No comment

Sometimes life defies parody. The Financial Times, like every other newspaper, led on Saturday with a terrorism-related story. But they know their readers well: "Anti-terror boost for duty-free" was the headline.

Technorati Tags: newspapers

Capitalist publishing doesn't work

From yesterday's Guardian, Publishers unite against Google, a story on Google Book Search.

"Joel Rickett, deputy editor of the Bookseller, says publishers are tempted to back Google in its partner programme because there are no devices in much of the world on to which a scanned book could be downloaded so the threat posed is limited. But that could change.

"Now you can search the text but you still need to buy the book," he says. "However, in less than five years' time an application will almost certainly be invented that makes leisure reading a more comfortable experience in digital format. So if you agree in principle that Google can scan anything it likes from a library, and feed it into its search engine, then it effectively becomes the backlist publisher and starts to destroy the basis of your business."

If this is true, if backlists are the basis of publisher's business, they've looked after them badly. Take the case of Patrick Hamilton, an author of some significance, yet at the moment I think only Twenty Thousand Streets under the Sky and Hangover Square are in print.

Technorati Tags: google

Suitability of Creative Commons for the UK Public Sector analysed in new report

Suitability of Creative Commons for the UK Public Sector analysed in new report: "

The Common Information Environment (CIE) today published the results of a study into the applicability of the international Creative Commons licenses to a range of UK public sector resources.

The study was undertaken for the CIE by Intrallect and the AHRC Research Centre for Studies in Intellectual Property & Technology Law at the University of Edinburgh.

The report, licensed with a Creative Commons Attribution licence to encourage dissemination and reuse of the findings, is available for download, along with a comprehensive set of appendices [both PDF downloads].

The CIE members are currently considering the report's recommendations.

Technorati Tags: Common Information Environment

"

(Via CIE News.)

Once again on the decline of the press

When the Independent started, one of their founding principles was that they would not cover the royal stories on which nearly every other newspaper wasted ink by the gallon (apart from the Morning Star who reported one of the royal weddings of that era with a one-line item saying that "traffic in central London was disrupted yesterday").

I was dismayed to see in Saturday's copy that the Prince Harry story, which could also be reported in one line, "Frivolous young man of Hanoverian descent wears swastika armband at fancy dress party", seemed to their editor to be worth three whole pages. I'd expect this from the Times, who left their sense of proportion behind along with several thousand employees when they moved to Wapping, but thought the Independent might still remember its origins.

The British Press

John Lloyd in Saturday's Financial Times magazine (online to subscribers only I'm afraid) writes on the state of the British press and believes that the Guardian is now the paper of the British establishment. He may have a point (actually one could argue this is the case under Labour governments) but it raises the question, what newspaper can one read nowadays and stay sane?
Lloyd rightly points to the degeneration of the Times under Murdoch; it's vulgar and sensationalist. I read the Times, in the unsupported belief that the crossword at least is better than those in rival titles. But even if it ever was the newspaper of record, it certainly isn't now. When my father died in 1997, I placed an announcement in the births, marriages and deaths columns, but I think the days are long gone when that was an effective way of telling people in one's circle of such events.
I was brought up on the Guardian, which my parents read and stuck with it for most of the 1970s and the early 1980s; I switched to the Independent when it started, because I'm a neophiliac, but in the early 1990s grew fed up with it, not least with the sixth-form essay tone of its leaders, which in those days must have been written by Andrew Marr. These days I read the Times during the week, the Independent and Financial Times on a Saturday and the Observer on a Sunday. I think the best English language newspaper I've ever read is the Irish Times, though I quite liked both the Washington Post and New York Times when visiting the USA last year. I can have as much of the world's press as I want, more or less, through the web and RSS feeds but I still need something on wood pulp, preferably in broadsheet format.
In the final analysis, I should start my own. In a democracy, any billionaire can.

TouchGraph browser for Amazon Citations

I saw on HubLog the TouchGraph browser for Amazon Citations: HubLog warns it may not be working, and I'm blowed if I can see it on the UK Amazon site. But this link to amzon.com works: Amazon's new citations feature
Interesting idea, though: citation indexing applied to a new area.

BMJ

Today's BMJ reports that BMJ Publishing is selling its book publishing operation, BMJ Books, to Blackwell Publishing.

LRB: replies to John Sutherland

Two letters in the new London Review of Books reply to John Sutherland's piece which I mentioned in this blog two weeks ago..
Jonathan Sawday suggests that 2% of the Arts and Humanities Research Board budget be set aside to support a peer-reviewed AHRB imprint, while Jon Price suggests institutional self-archiving.

LRB: John Sutherland on publishing

John Sutherland writes the diary in the latest London Review of Books , which he devotes to a discussion of publishing. His remarks were inspired by a letter to all his members from last year's President of the Modern Languages Association (for me and other medical librarians the "other" MLA...those initals evoke the Medical Library Association for us). So while what he has to say is chiefly about monographs in the humanties, it has much interest for the growing debate on scientific publishing. His final suggestion is that every university teacher should be given $200 in book tokens redeemable against the publications any of the top fifty academic presses, this being sufficient to revive academic publishing.
Suerland has some interesting things to say about changes in publishing and their effect on libraries, but he seems to underestimate the potential of institutional archiving and other new ways of publishing have to solve the problem. He claims that quality control has been "almost impossible to apply to web generated scholarship" something that those who edit and contribute to many peer-reviewed electronic publications would contest.
Sutherland, John
Diary
London Review of Books 26 (2); 31 22 January 2004